Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured with clear sequencing and an explicit freshness-retry feedback loop. For a simple, single-purpose skill it is exemplary and needs no changes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding or explanation of basic concepts Claude already knows; every line carries operational guidance, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is given throughout — exact tool and operation names (read/write/patch/patch_text), precise anchor syntax ('@@ existing line', '+new line', '-old'), and prefix rules. As an instruction-only skill, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Editing Flow sequences steps clearly (read → patch → patch_text → edits) and includes a validation/retry feedback loop ('If freshness-aware line patching rejects an edit as stale, reread the file and retry'), plus a Failure Handling section. For a single-purpose skill this is unambiguous with explicit checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed, and content is organized into clear, well-labeled sections (Boundary, Access Modes, Editing Flow, Patch Text Rules, Failure Handling), which per the rubric guidance earns a 3 for simple skills with good organization. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |