Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is dense, executable, and well-organized: a complete action reference, correct distinctions between cron schedules and ISO plan datetimes, and explicit safety checkpoints including UUID-based identification for destructive operations. The main weaknesses are inconsistent invocation formats between examples and the absence of any post-operation verification step.
Suggestions
Make the invocation format consistent across all examples (either always `tool_name`/`tool_args` or always `action`), or state explicitly which wrapper the scheduler tool expects.
Add a post-run verification step, e.g. "After `run_task`, use `show_task` or `wait_for_task` to confirm the result before reporting success."
Drop or fold the final standalone `Example` section into the Actions section to remove redundancy with the two full JSON examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a per-action parameter list, terse rules ("Do not put ISO datetimes into `schedule`") and two compact JSON examples with no concept padding. Not a 5 because the trailing standalone `Example` section is near-redundant with the two full JSON examples above it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every action is documented with its required and optional parameters, and the two JSON examples are copy-paste ready. Not a 5 because the examples use inconsistent invocation formats — the create examples use a bare `{"action": ...}` while the final example wraps in `{"tool_name": "scheduler", "tool_args": {...}}` — leaving the correct call format ambiguous. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Explicit pre-mutation checkpoints are present ("Always inspect existing tasks before creating, updating, deleting, or running one" and "For destructive operations, identify the task by UUID after lookup"), so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. Not a 5 because there is no post-run verification or error-recovery step (e.g., using `show_task`/`wait_for_task` to confirm the outcome). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear Actions / Schedule Fields / Safety sections and no bundle files to navigate. Not a 5 because at ~80 lines with a full inline action reference it sits above the under-50-line simple-skill case, so the inline API listing is a minor organization gap rather than ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |