CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

next

Surface the most valuable next action by combining task stack, queue state, inbox pressure, health, and goals. Recommends one specific action with rationale. Triggers on "/next", "what should I do", "what's next".

71

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with executable commands and explicit checkpoints, but it is verbose and monolithic with no progressive file structure despite its length.

Suggestions

Trim rationale-padding ('Why This Priority', 'Why log?', anti-patterns that restate earlier rules) to tighten the body toward a leaner token budget.

Split the maintenance-condition reference table and Edge Cases into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. conditions.md, edge-cases.md) with clear links from the main body to improve progressive disclosure.

Add a short explicit validation checkpoint before output (e.g. confirm the chosen recommendation survives dedup and is a concrete command) to make the workflow's verify step explicit rather than implicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly operational (signal tables, jq/find/grep commands, threshold tables) but padded with rationale justifications ('Why This Priority' columns, 'Why log?' sections, anti-patterns restating earlier rules) that Claude does not need, so it is not lean enough for a 3.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable bash/jq snippets (queue migration, maintenance task creation, signal collection), concrete threshold tables, output templates, and Good/Bad examples that are copy-paste ready; placeholder substitution is explicitly justified by the domain-adaptation design.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-8 are explicitly ordered ('Execute these steps IN ORDER') with a priority cascade, deduplication checkpoint, and tiered classification; the skill is non-destructive (recommend-only invariant) so the missing validate-retry loop is not a disqualifier.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single monolithic ~400-line SKILL.md with all content inline; sections are well-organized but substantial content (condition reference, edge cases) that could be split into one-level-deep references remains inline, matching the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: specific, third-person, with explicit natural triggers and a clear what-and-when structure. It is concise and distinguishable from other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the core action ('Surface the most valuable next action') and lists multiple concrete signal sources ('task stack, queue state, inbox pressure, health, and goals') plus the outcome ('Recommends one specific action with rationale'), matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (surface/ recommend one action with rationale) and 'when' via an explicit 'Triggers on' clause, so it is not capped at 2 for a missing when-clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit natural-language triggers ('/next', 'what should I do', 'what's next') are phrases users would naturally say, giving good coverage of natural terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The vault/task-state recommendation niche is specific with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; the slight genericness of 'what should I do' is offset by the /next-specific framing.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
agenticnotetaking/arscontexta
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.