Conciseness

The ~35-line body is lean and directive — numbered steps and an output contract with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place; it cannot be faulted for verbosity, only for terseness, which the dimension does not penalize.

Actionability

Step 10 provides copy-paste-ready commands ('bash "$ENGINE/scripts/verify-generated-package.sh" "$PACKAGE_ROOT"', the public safety gate) and concrete paths like '.agentlas/mode-map.json'. However, 'Run mode classification', 'Load only the matching support skills', and 'Resolve ENGINE using /hep-build Step 0' reference procedures and skills that are never named or defined, leaving minor gaps.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 10-step sequence exists with an explicit verification checkpoint (three verify/safety scripts in step 10) and a clarify-questions gate in step 4. It misses a 5 because there is no feedback loop — nothing instructs what to do when a verify or safety-check script fails.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and the body is cleanly organized into a 'Procedure' section and an 'Output' contract, with external dependencies (AGENTS.md, .agentlas/mode-map.json, /hep-build) referenced one level deep. Per the simple-skill exception, this scores 5 on well-organized sections alone.

Specificity

The description lists several concrete actions — 'creating a single Agentlas agent', 'creating a multi-agent team', 'packaging an existing local/external agent into Agentlas architecture' — which is specific within its domain. It falls short of a 5 because the actions stay high-level and 'Agentlas architecture' is undefined jargon, leaving minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ('creating a single Agentlas agent, creating a multi-agent team, or packaging an existing local/external agent') and when ('Use when creating...' plus 'Make sure to use this for /meta-agent requests'). The trigger phrases are concrete, matching the top anchor; score 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit than it is.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases like 'creating a ... agent', 'multi-agent team', and the concrete command trigger '/meta-agent requests' give good keyword coverage. A few natural variations users might say ('wrap an agent', 'import an agent', 'agent builder') are missing, so it does not reach comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Agentlas' niche and the '/meta-agent' command trigger are highly distinctive, giving minimal overlap risk with other skills. It clearly carves out its own trigger space rather than overlapping with generic agent-creation skills.