Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured for a simple router skill, but it only restates the skill's purpose without any actionable procedure for how to staff roles from the local directory. Adding minimal concrete guidance would substantially raise actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a concrete one- or two-step procedure for staffing (e.g., how to read/discover packages under ~/.agentlas/workforce/local and how a role is loaded), even if it is a single command or file-reading step.
Include at least one executable hint — a command, a glob, or a file-reading step — so the guidance instructs rather than only describes.
If staffing has a validation step (e.g., confirming a package is registered before loading it), note it to strengthen the workflow's single checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean two-line overview with a heading and no padding or over-explanation; every token earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | "Staff specialist roles specifically from locally registered packages in ~/.agentlas/workforce/local" gives a high-level hint and a concrete path, but no executable steps, commands, or procedure for how staffing actually happens. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill the single intended action (staff from the local directory) is identifiable, but the body never specifies the mechanism or any sequence, leaving the workflow only weakly defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, requires no external references, and is organized with a clear heading and short overview, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |