Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized command catalog that respects the token budget and lists concrete subcommands. Its main gap is the absence of validation guidance around the destructive uninstall operation, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/safety checkpoint for `uninstall [--purge]` (e.g. confirm the restore archive exists and is readable before purging) to lift the workflow-clarity cap.
Include one or two full invocation examples for the most common commands (e.g. `agentlas-one on ava`, `agentlas-one remember "..."`) to move actionability from concrete-named to copy-paste ready.
Briefly sequence the install → on → status flow as a short ordered quick-start so users see how the commands fit together.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (e.g. "Anything not listed here does not exist — do not invent one.") earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete named commands with flags and argument syntax (e.g. "on [name]", "uninstall [--purge]", "promote <id> [reason]") provide mostly executable guidance, but lack full copy-paste usage examples, leaving minor gaps below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The destructive uninstall [--purge] operation is listed without any validation/verification checkpoint, and commands are presented as a flat catalog rather than a sequenced workflow; per the rubric's destructive-operation cap this cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, requires no external references, and is organized into a clear intro plus a Commands section, satisfying the simple-skill exception for the top progressive-disclosure anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |