Conciseness

Every line is a dense operational rule — tool names, argument constraints, and measured failure modes ("⚠️ requiredSkills에 시드 온톨로지 ID를 걸면 실후보 전원이 가짜 결격을 단다(실측)") — with no concept explanations or padding. Not 4 — no trimmable over-explanation found; the date "오너 결정 2026-08-09" is provenance for a standing policy, not time-rotting API guidance.

Actionability

Exact tool calls with argument names ('workforce.search_candidates', 'sourceScope=network', 'stage=planner/worker/synthesis/verifier', 'projectDir 필수'), copy-paste command templates ('hep-orch orchestrator=<tier|model> worker=<tier|model>'), concrete paths ('~/.agentlas/one/'), and envelope syntax ('## Memory Events', '"supersedes":"<h:16hex>"'). As an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable and covers the common cases; not 4 — no significant executable gap remains.

Workflow Clarity

The 편성 workflow is a coherent numbered sequence (roster check → conditional search → host selection → validate → prepare → auto-binding) with explicit checkpoints ('workforce.validate_selection' on verbatim federation results), and section 5 adds real failure-mode checkpoints (plugin cache reload, strict local Core, Hub 503). Not 5 — error-recovery loops are implicit (what to do when validate_selection or prepare_execution fails is unstated); not 3 — checkpoints are explicit, not missing.

Progressive Disclosure

Five well-scoped sections with no nested references, but the body's central navigation pointer — "[INDEX.md](INDEX.md)가 정본" (the canonical tool registry) — resolves to nothing: the bundle contains only SKILL.md (no references/ directory, no INDEX.md). The release-build note explains generation but gives no in-bundle fallback for tool discovery, which goes beyond anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps', while the structure itself is far better than anchor 2's inlining.

Specificity

Names five concrete capability areas tied to specific subsystems ("hep-network 편성, hep-graph 자동화, cargo/Agent Cloud·marketplace 활용, workforce 로스터 재사용, 메모리 계약"), which matches 'several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage'. Not 3 — far more than 1-2 actions are named; not 5 — the actions are nominalized domain scopes rather than fully concrete operations, and the body's validation/pitfall duties are uncovered.

Completeness

Explicit 'what' (operating procedures across the five named areas) and explicit 'when' ("One(개인 에이전트)이 Agentlas를 조작할 때 이 절차를 따른다"), so the missing-trigger cap does not apply. Not 5 — the 'when' is a single general condition rather than the concrete per-task trigger phrases of the anchor-5 example.

Trigger Term Quality

Covers the system's natural vocabulary comprehensively (Agentlas, hep-network, hep-graph, cargo, Agent Cloud, marketplace, workforce, 메모리) — exactly the terms a user of this system would say. Not 5 — no synonym/variation coverage for common operations (e.g., 워커 모집, 에이전트 검색, 그래프 자동화) that the body itself uses; not 3 — keyword coverage is strong and domain-complete, not partial.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Unique proper nouns (Agentlas, hep-network, hep-graph, workforce, cargo) establish a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk — no generic term is shared with other plausible skills. Anchor 4's 'minor overlap risk' does not apply.