CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

agentlas-security-scan

Use when an agent folder must pass the Agentlas Cloud 2-stage security scan (static rules + BYOK LLM judgment) before private sync or public publish, or when asked to run/interpret `hephaestus security scan`.

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is exemplary: lean, fully executable, and organized around a validated two-stage workflow with explicit gating, exit-code semantics, and a redaction safeguard for secrets. No dimension shows a gap against the top anchors.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line is operational or directly clarifies the division of responsibility ('The Cloud server never calls an LLM... You are the stage-2 judge'); there is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding. Re-reading the 4 anchor, no over-explanation instances could be trimmed, so the 5 anchor fits best.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: exact commands with exit-code semantics ('--strict --acknowledge-warn exits 0; --strict alone exits 2 on WARN'), an exact copy-paste JSON contract with enumerated verdict and type values, and concrete file paths ('.agentlas/security-scan.json', '<agent-folder>/.agentlas/security-llm-judgment.json').

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The two-stage sequence is explicit with validation checkpoints and feedback loops: judge files, write the judgment, re-run the scanner to merge, then gate on the combined verdict with BLOCK/WARN/PASS handling and an approval loop before publish. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since validation and gating are explicitly present.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-file skill with no bundle files; all content (commands, judgment contract, CLI reference, output contract) is needed on every invocation, so inlining is correct. Sections (Stage 1, Stage 2, CLI, Output) are well-organized and easy to navigate with no buried or nested references.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit trigger clause, concrete tool-specific keywords, and excellent distinctiveness. Its main limitation is that the 'what' is expressed as the condition to satisfy rather than the skill's own actions, leaving capability coverage implied.

Suggestions

State the skill's actions explicitly, e.g. 'Runs the static scan, judges the agent folder for prompt injection, tool poisoning, and secret exfiltration, writes the LLM judgment file, and gates publish on the combined verdict.'

Add natural trigger synonyms such as 'security review' or 'is it safe to publish/sync my agent' to broaden keyword coverage.

Mention the output artifact (merged security-scan report and verdict) so the what includes the deliverable, not just the gate condition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain concretely ('2-stage security scan (static rules + BYOK LLM judgment)') and specific actions/triggers ('run/interpret `hephaestus security scan`', 'before private sync or public publish'). It falls below the 5 anchor because it frames the what as the condition to pass rather than listing the skill's own concrete actions (judging packages, writing the judgment file, gating publish).

4 / 5

Completeness

Has an explicit 'Use when...' clause with two concrete trigger conditions plus a clear what ('pass the Agentlas Cloud 2-stage security scan (static rules + BYOK LLM judgment)'). Below 5 because the what describes the gate the folder must pass rather than explicitly stating what the skill itself does when invoked.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say: 'security scan', 'run/interpret `hephaestus security scan`', 'private sync or public publish', 'agent folder'. Not a 5 because common variations like 'security review', 'scan results', or 'safe to publish' phrasing are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Product-specific terms ('Agentlas Cloud', 'hephaestus security scan') create a clear niche with distinct triggers and virtually no overlap risk with generic security or publish skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

agentlas-ai/Agentlas-OS

Path

skills/agentlas-security-scan/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.