Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with concrete budgets, a verbatim default question, and translation rules, plus a clear sequenced procedure with escalation checkpoints. Minor redundancy (a duplicated question) and the absence of a deeper reference bundle keep it just short of top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes competence, giving specific budgets and translations rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows; the only trim opportunity is the Korean question duplicated in both the Procedure and Default Questions sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is provided throughout — exact batch sizes ("chat 3-5," "stormbreaker <= 8," "build 8-12"), a verbatim plain-language question, and explicit translation mappings — with only minor gaps in coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The eight-step Procedure is clearly sequenced with checkpoints (re-run classification in step 7, escalate to the Builder gate in step 5) and a stop-rule section, missing only a fully explicit validate-fix-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Procedure, Budgets, Default Questions, Plain-Language Question Rule, Reference) with a one-level pointer to docs/clarify-question-loop.md, though no bundle files exist to verify deeper reference structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |