Conciseness

The ~44-line body contains no concept explanations Claude already knows and no filler; every line is operational (CLI resolution, exact subcommand dispatch, reporting and error rules). It matches 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place' rather than level 4, which expects over-explanation that could be trimmed — there is none.

Actionability

The CLI-resolution bash block is copy-paste executable, and every command gives the exact invocation with quoting and flags (e.g., '"$CLI" graph run "<name>" -y' with '--input "<value>" when required). Common cases — CLI missing, missing required input, non-zero exit — are all explicitly handled, matching the fully-executable level-5 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

Each subcommand is sequenced with explicit checkpoints: the run flow mandates showing the graph first, obtaining any missing input 'without inventing it', and the non-zero exit rule ('relay the exact refusal and stop; do not retry with a guess') provides a defined error checkpoint. No destructive or batch validation gap applies since the skill only requests runs, so it sits at the level-5 anchor rather than level 4 ('most checkpoints present').

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the body is organized into clear sections (capability scope, CLI resolution, commands, reporting rules) with nothing that belongs in a separate file. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, this qualifies for the level-5 anchor.

Specificity

The description lists four concrete actions — "create, list, inspect, or request a run" — on a specifically named domain ("an Agentlas automation graph"), which comprehensively covers the skill's actual command set (list, show, new, run). It matches the anchor 'Lists multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage' rather than the level-4 anchor, which expects minor gaps in coverage.

Completeness

The "when" is explicit and concrete ("Use when the user types /hep-graph or /agentlas-graph, or asks to..."), but the "what" appears only embedded in the trigger clause — the skill's capabilities are never stated directly (e.g., 'Creates, lists, inspects, and requests runs of Agentlas graphs'). This matches the level-4 anchor ('both present; when could be more explicit') with the what being the less explicit half, so it does not reach the clearly-stated-both level-5 anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers include the slash commands "/hep-graph or /agentlas-graph" plus natural verb phrases ("create, list, inspect, or request a run"), giving good keyword coverage. Common synonyms like "show", "view", or "display a graph" are missing, so it fits the level-4 anchor ('a few natural terms missing') rather than the comprehensive level-5 anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is unmistakable — "Agentlas automation graph" with product-specific slash commands — and no generic phrasing appears that would collide with other skills. This is a clear match for the level-5 anchor 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'.