Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplarily lean, single-purpose verification procedure with copy-paste bash commands and an explicit completion gate. Its only weaknesses are the unspecified error-recovery path when a verification script fails and the vague 'inspect' instruction beyond file presence.
Suggestions
Add one line on what to do when a verification script fails (e.g., fix the reported issue and re-run) to close the feedback loop.
State what 'inspect' means for the listed adapters and install files (presence only vs. content checks) so the verification criterion is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and fully operational — "Resolve `ENGINE` using `/hep-build` Step 0", the three bash commands, and the file checklist — with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The three bash commands (e.g., "bash \"$ENGINE/scripts/verify-generated-package.sh\" \"$PACKAGE_ROOT\"") are concrete and executable, but "inspect the generated package's selected adapters and install files" does not state what to inspect beyond file presence, and ENGINE resolution is delegated to an external skill — minor gaps that fit anchor 4 rather than the fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (resolve variables, run the three verification scripts, inspect files, apply the completion gate "Do not claim completion if any required file is missing") is clear with explicit validation scripts and a checkpoint, but no error-recovery loop is described for when a verification script fails, which anchor 5 requires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with no need for external reference files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist in the bundle); the content is well organized with a heading, code block, and checklist, so it qualifies for the simple-skill exception scoring 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |