Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally concise and well-structured into a procedure and output schema, but the steps read as production directives rather than fully executable guidance, and validation checkpoints remain implicit rather than explicit.
Suggestions
Add a concrete populated example of the runtime matrix (one row per runtime with sample values) so the expected output is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
Promote validation to an explicit step — e.g. "6. Verify: confirm each runtime's verification command runs and unsupported capabilities are stated" — with a fix-and-retry loop.
Show one example adapter structure or a snippet of `.agentlas/global-commands.json` to make the adapter-writing steps actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At roughly 20 lines it is lean and efficient with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — quoting the procedure "Keep `AGENTS.md` as the canonical behavior contract" and the field list in step 2, every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete guidance — a named file path ("Write or repair `.agentlas/global-commands.json`") and an explicit output schema ("runtime", "entry_point", "global_command", "adapter_files", "memory_access", "limitations", "verification") — but the steps are directives to produce rather than executable commands, and no populated matrix example or sample verification command is provided. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps form a clear sequence and the per-runtime "verification" field plus step 5 ("State unsupported capabilities explicitly") imply checkpoints, but validation is never an explicit step and there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, leaving checkpoints implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, it is well-organized into clearly labeled "Procedure" and "Output" sections, which per the simple-skills scoring note earns a top score for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |