Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, high-signal reference spec: exact per-field rules, honest gating guidance, and a runnable checklist with validation. Its main weaknesses are the absent worked-example card, missing fix-and-revalidate recovery steps, and dangling pointers to bundle files that are not shipped alongside it.
Suggestions
Ship or inline a minimal valid routing-card example: 'templates/routing-card.example.json' and 'schemas/routing-card.schema.json' are referenced as the complete passing card and validation target but are not in the bundle, so the checklist's final step cannot actually be run.
Add an error-recovery loop to the checklist after the validation step (e.g., 'if validation fails, fix the flagged fields and re-validate before publishing') to satisfy the feedback-loop expectation for batch/gated artifacts.
Trim repeated gate warnings (e.g., consolidate the 'never an identity/callability gate' phrasing used for both workforce.languages and workforce.modalities) to recover a few tokens without losing the rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — field tables carry the payload with no padding about JSON or schemas Claude already knows. A few warning phrasings repeat ('never an identity/callability gate', 'It is not an allowlist') and could be trimmed, placing it at the 4 anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Per-field guidance is precise and executable: 'Exactly "routing-card/2.0"', '4–8 ids in verb_object snake_case', '6+ real sentences... 3 Korean and 3 English', plus a builder-runnable checklist ending in schema validation. The gap keeping it below 5 is that the complete worked example it defers to ('templates/routing-card.example.json') is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Checklist a builder can run' gives a clear 8-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Validate: the card parses against schemas/routing-card.schema.json'), matching the 4 anchor. It falls short of 5 because there is no error-recovery loop — no instruction for what to do when validation fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, well-sectioned file with references that are one level deep and clearly named inline (schema, contracts, ontology, example template). The minor gap is that none of the referenced paths exist in this bundle — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ — so a reader cannot actually navigate to them, which keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |