Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sequenced instruction skill that names specific files and includes an approval-gate checkpoint. Its main weakness is actionability: it defers the detailed research-gate procedure to a non-bundled reference and lists output files without specifying their contents.
Suggestions
Inline a brief summary of the research-gate procedure (or bundle docs/builder-interview-research-gate.md) so the core step is actionable without an external file.
Add one-line templates or required fields for each docs/*.agentlas file so 'add these files' becomes concrete guidance rather than a bare file list.
Make the referenced docs explicitly inputs vs. outputs so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~30 lines with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every step is directive and assumes competence, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete artifacts (e.g. ".agentlas/memory-map.json", "docs/builder-interview.md") and a specific "8-12 question" batch, but the core research-gate procedure is deferred to an unbundled docs/builder-interview-research-gate.md and files are listed to "add" without their contents — concrete but incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is present with an explicit approval-gate checkpoint (step 6) and verification/approval_gate named as outputs; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the absence of a validate-fix-retry loop does not cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained, and organized into clear Procedure and Output sections with no bundle needed; per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections warrant a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |