Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable routing skill with concrete message-tool examples and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is conciseness: the same routing rule is repeated across several sections and one protocol paragraph is a long run-on sentence.
Suggestions
State the same-room vs cross-room / `message`-tool rule once authoritatively (e.g. in Routing Gate) and have later sections reference it instead of restating it, cutting roughly 5 redundant repetitions.
Break the long NO_REPLY protocol sentence (line 51) into a short numbered list or bulleted conditions for faster scanning.
If the detailed requester-report routing table and NO_REPLY protocol grow further, consider moving them to a reference file to keep SKILL.md a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core same-room/cross-room rule is restated roughly five times (Routing Gate #3, the 'Hard rule', Task Assignment Room, Same Room, and Cross-Room) and line 51 is an ~80-word run-on sentence, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened; it avoids score 1 only because no space is spent explaining concepts Claude already knows — all content is domain-specific routing logic. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready `message` tool JSON call with a concrete `room:!roomid:domain` target, a concrete same-room @mention template with a real task ID, and a routing table, matching 'fully executable code/commands; specific examples; copy-paste ready'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Routing Gate gives a numbered 1–3 decision sequence, and there are explicit validation checkpoints ("If the recorded requester is missing or does not match… stop and fix project metadata", the pre-send content check, and "If two rounds produce no new task… stop replying"), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is cohesive decision-time routing logic with no reference material to defer; it is well-organized into clearly-headed sections (Routing Gate, Task Assignment Room, Requester Reports, Same Room, Cross-Room, Rules) with easy navigation and no nested references, so the single-file structure is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |