Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable routing policy: concrete message formats, a routing table, explicit hard rules, and stop conditions leave little ambiguity about what to do. Its main cost is repetition — the same-room and delegate_task rules are each stated several times across sections — and one long prose paragraph that would be clearer as a sequence.
Suggestions
State the same-room/cross-room rule once in the Routing Gate as the hard rule, and have the Requester Reports, Same Room, and Cross-Room sections reference it instead of restating it in different words.
Consolidate the three separate statements of the `delegate_task` auto-notification rule into the Task Assignment Room section and briefly cross-reference it from Same Room and Cross-Room.
Restructure the Leader-DM `NO_REPLY` paragraph as a short ordered list of conditions (pre-assignment phase, allowed exceptions, post-assignment update) so the sequence is scannable instead of embedded in prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No concept-explanation padding, but the same-room/cross-room rule ("do not call the `message` tool back into the current room") is restated in the Routing Gate hard rule, Requester Reports, Same Room, Cross-Room, and Rules sections, and the `delegate_task` auto-notification rule repeats across three sections. The repetition is noticeable rather than minor, fitting anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready artifacts: a concrete JSON `message` payload, an exact `@worker:domain` mention format, a Source→Target Room→Report To table, the `NO_REPLY` rule, and a concrete list of low-information pings to avoid. The instruction "Resolve the recipient Matrix ID and target room from `agt` CLI immediately before sending" lacks an example invocation, a minor gap that keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Routing Gate is an ordered 1-2-3 decision procedure with a hard rule, and Requester Reports includes explicit checkpoints ("stop and fix project metadata before reporting", mandatory requester notification, "If two rounds produce no new task, question, or decision, stop replying"). It falls below anchor 5 because the dense Leader-DM `NO_REPLY` paragraph buries its sequence conditions in prose rather than an explicit ordered flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with no nested references and no bundle files to mis-route, and everything is at most one section deep. At roughly 93 lines with subsections like the Leader-DM `NO_REPLY` policy folded into Requester Reports, the structure is good but not the crisp overview-plus-signaled-references shape of anchor 5, and it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |