Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable routing skill with concrete examples and clear decision logic, weakened mainly by repetition of the same-room rule and a dense NO_REPLY passage. It is self-contained with good sectioning but slightly over-long for a single-purpose skill.
Suggestions
Consolidate the same-room routing rule into a single canonical statement and reference it from the Same Room / Cross-Room sections instead of restating it three times.
Break the long NO_REPLY rule in the Requester Reports section into a short bulleted checklist (when to reply NO_REPLY, what counts as the first visible message, when to send the follow-up update).
Tighten the Task Assignment Room section by stating the 'delegate_task auto-notification @mentions the Worker's full Matrix ID' fact once and trimming the redundant restatements.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but the same-room routing rule is restated three or more times ('Hard rule: do not call the message tool to send a message back into the current room', 'Do not use the message tool for same-room replies', 'Use the message tool only when the target room is not the current room'), and the delegate_task auto-mention point is repeated; the NO_REPLY rule is one dense run-on sentence that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste JSON example for the message tool, a concrete @mention text format, a routing table, and explicit if/then decision logic ('If sender is Team Admin, the target room is Leader DM'); minor gaps include deferring report content to project-management and the vague directive to 'stop and fix project metadata before reporting'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Routing Gate gives a clear numbered sequence (1-3) with checkpoints such as the 'remove all Matrix IDs from the message in your head' pre-send check and the 'If two rounds produce no new task... stop replying' stopping rule; this is message routing rather than a batch/destructive operation, so the validation cap does not apply, but the checkpoints are somewhat scattered rather than structured as explicit validate-fix-retry loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Routing Gate, Task Assignment Room, Requester Reports, Same Room, Cross-Room, Rules) and self-contained with no external references; at ~90 lines it exceeds the 50-line simple-skill exception, and the Requester Reports section is dense enough that some material could be separated, keeping it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |