Conciseness

The commands and steps are lean and directive, but there is unnecessary explanation: "Skills are modular packages that extend agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, and tools" explains a concept Claude already knows, the "Security Assurance" section is promotional padding, and full scripted example responses ("I searched for skills related to 'xyz' but didn't find any matches...") are verbose. It is not a 2 because most sections are tight and operational, and not a 4 because multiple blocks can be trimmed without losing guidance.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: the copy-paste FIND_SKILLS_SCRIPT resolution loop, exact invocations ("${FIND_SKILLS_SCRIPT}" find [query] / install <skill>), concrete query examples ("react performance", "pr review", "changelog"), and the verified scripts/agentteams-find-skill.sh that actually supports the find and install subcommands described. Specific examples cover the common cases, including the no-results path.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced process (Step 1 understand -> Step 2 search -> Step 2A direct install -> Step 3 present -> Step 4 offer to install) with decision guidance ("If the provided name looks ambiguous or you are not sure about the exact package name, search first") and a critical warning to copy the exact install command. It is not a 5 because there is no validation checkpoint after install (e.g., confirming the skill installed and loads); it is not a 3 because the operation is neither destructive nor batch, so no cap applies, and the sequence's checkpoints are only implicitly missing.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure: clear section headers, and the one bundle file (scripts/agentteams-find-skill.sh, verified to exist and support the documented subcommands) is referenced one level deep with a dedicated "Skill Resources" section explaining how to resolve it. It is not a 5 because the ~180-line body inlines content that could live in a reference file (the category table, search tips, and scripted example responses), leaving minor organization gaps.

Specificity

"Discover and install agent skills from the open ecosystem" names the domain and two concrete actions, matching the anchor-3 example ("Processes PDF files and extracts content"), but the description uses second-person voice twice ("Use when you encounter an unfamiliar domain... that you lack specialized knowledge about"), which the judging guidelines penalize by reducing specificity by 1. It is not a 1 because the actions named are concrete and real, not abstract filler.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: what ("Discover and install agent skills from the open ecosystem") and when ("Use when you encounter an unfamiliar domain, framework, or workflow..."). It does not reach anchor 5 because the when-clause is abstract ("that you lack specialized knowledge about") rather than concrete user-quoted trigger phrases, and it is clearly above anchor 3 since the when is explicit, not weakly implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage: "skills", "discover", "install", "searching for skills", and "unfamiliar domain, framework, or workflow" are terms a user or coordinator would plausibly say. It falls short of anchor 5 because natural user phrasings like "find a skill", "is there a skill for X", or "install a skill from the market" are missing; it is above anchor 3 because coverage is broad rather than partial.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche (registry skill discovery/installation) that is distinct from domain-specific skills, and "when your coordinator suggests searching for skills" is a distinct trigger. It is not anchor 5 because "when you encounter an unfamiliar domain, framework, or workflow that you lack specialized knowledge about" is broad enough to overlap with almost any capability-extension skill.