CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

task-management

Use before any Leader taskflow call or task-level workflow involving delegating a ready DAG or Loop node, writing task meta/spec, checking a Worker task result, handling result statuses, task directory ownership, or Worker result contracts. Always use this skill when the request mentions delegate_task, check_task, task result.md, task spec.md, BLOCKED, REVISION_NEEDED, INTERRUPTED, SUCCESS, or assigning/delegating a Worker task.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable operational guidance with concrete tool payloads, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean structure. The main gaps are mild redundancy around the auto-notification warning and inline detail that the existing reference file could absorb.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three repetitions of 'do not send a second assignment message' into a single authoritative statement.

Move the Worker-name localpart lookup procedure and common-mistake table into references/dag-tasks.md, leaving a one-line rule plus pointer in SKILL.md.

Relocate or date-stamp the time-sensitive 'for now' note about check_active_tasks/Kubernetes probes in a dedicated caveats section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational with essentially no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'do not send a second assignment message' warning is repeated three times (Tool Boundary, the standalone note, and After delegation), and the time-sensitive 'for now' Kubernetes check_active_tasks note sits outside any deprecated-patterns section.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready JSON payloads for delegate_task and check_task, an executable agt get workers lookup with mechanical localpart extraction, exact file-path ownership blocks, and complete status/marker tables fully specify the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Both delegation and result-checking are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — the paused-project stop, blocking directory pulls, accept-before-[x] gating, and the mandatory requester-notification closure form real feedback and failure loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A well-signaled, one-level-deep References section ('Read only when needed') points to the real references/dag-tasks.md, and sections are clearly organized. Not 5 because a 296-line body inlines detail (the full Worker-name lookup section and its mistake table) that could be pushed to the existing reference.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with concrete enumerated actions and explicit, token-level trigger guidance. Its only weakness is that the capability statement is expressed purely as trigger conditions rather than a direct statement of what the skill does.

Suggestions

Lead with a direct third-person capability statement (e.g., 'Delegate ready DAG/Loop nodes to Workers, write task meta/spec, and validate Worker results.') before the trigger clauses.

Trim the redundant framing — 'Use before any…' and 'Always use this skill when…' can be merged into one trigger sentence.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete, domain-specific actions — 'delegating a ready DAG or Loop node, writing task meta/spec, checking a Worker task result, handling result statuses, task directory ownership, or Worker result contracts' — with comprehensive coverage of the skill's task-level scope.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both what and when are present — the enumerated operations cover the what and 'Always use this skill when the request mentions…' is an explicit trigger clause. It falls short of 5 only because capabilities are framed entirely as invocation conditions ('Use before any…') rather than direct statements of what the skill does.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It lists the exact natural tokens a request would mention ('delegate_task, check_task, task result.md, task spec.md, BLOCKED, REVISION_NEEDED, INTERRUPTED, SUCCESS') plus plain-language phrasings like 'assigning/delegating a Worker task', covering synonyms comprehensively.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinct tool tokens and 'task-level' scoping give it a clear niche separate from sibling skills, though it operates in a multi-skill ecosystem where 'task workflow' terminology could pull in the related project-management/team-coordination skills.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams

Path

manager/agent/team-leader-agent/skills/task-management/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.