Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body that surfaces only non-obvious operational specifics (paths, formats, commands, LRU rule) with no padding. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit push-success verification checkpoint in the progress workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and every token earns its place: specific paths, the LRU top-10 rule, the YYYY-MM-DD sort-order gotcha, the mc cp push command, and the task-history.json schema are all operational detail Claude would not already know, with no concept padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a concrete progress-log path template, a copy-paste 'mc cp' push command, a complete task-history.json example, and a numbered resume-flow procedure covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The resume flow is a clear 4-step sequence with an explicit fallback ('if not there, check history-tasks/{task-id}.json') and the progress flow mandates 'push after each update', but there is no explicit verification that a push succeeded, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No external references are needed and the content is organized into clearly headed sections (Gotchas, Progress Log, Task History, Resume Flow), satisfying the well-organized-sections bar for a compact single-purpose skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |