Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Concise and highly actionable with concrete commands and templates, plus a well-organized self-contained structure. The gap is workflow clarity: clear steps but no validation checkpoints or error recovery around the overwrite/sync operations.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints, e.g., confirm the `mc mirror` push succeeded before proceeding, and verify `spec.md`/`plan.md` exist during resume before reading them.
Include an error-recovery note for the resume flow (e.g., what to do if `task-history.json` is missing, empty, or `hermes-sync` fails).
Note the destructive nature of `mc mirror --overwrite` and add a guard (e.g., confirm the task-id directory is correct before mirroring).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: gives paths, format templates, a command, and a JSON schema directly without explaining what progress logging or LRU caches are; assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, a copy-paste `mc mirror` push command with flags, an exact progress-log template, and a JSON schema — executable rather than descriptive. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The resume flow is a clear 5-step sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops, and the `mc mirror --overwrite` push is a batch/overwrite operation that should trigger the cap at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, well-organized skill (Gotchas, Progress Log, Task History, Resume Flow) with no external references needed, scoring 3 under the simple-skills note for under-50-line-ish content with clear sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |