Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, directive strategy skill that assumes competence and supplies concrete operations and checkpoints. It scores consistently strong across dimensions; a worked example and trimming the small redundancy would lift actionability and conciseness.
Suggestions
Add one short worked scenario (e.g. a 3-node DAG with an evaluation decision) to make the abstract strategy fully concrete.
Tighten the Patch Rules section so it does not restate guidance already given in Design The Work and Result Decisions.
Consider extracting the multi-step interruption procedure into a reference file to keep SKILL.md a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, directive, and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what a DAG/Project/Worker is; minor redundancy between the Patch Rules anti-patterns and earlier guidance keeps it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete guidance: exact strategic flows, named operations (plan_dag, ready_nodes, plan_loop, record_loop_iteration), and explicit decision lists, with only a worked example missing for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced DAG and Loop flows with evaluation checkpoints after each result/iteration, plus a confirmation gate before hard interruption; minor validation gaps remain but no destructive/batch cap applies to this strategy skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with no bundle files needed; the ~175 lines of dense strategy is self-contained and navigable, though parts (detailed interruption procedure, per-mode definition lists) could plausibly live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |