Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, actionable content that assumes Claude's competence and provides concrete path conventions and filesync examples. Minor redundancy, a described-not-shown publish_file call, and the absence of an explicit validation loop keep it just below top marks.
Suggestions
Consolidate the two overlapping "do not expose storage internals" statements into one to tighten conciseness.
Add a complete artifact publish_file example call (with path, target/roomId, and parentEventId) alongside the filesync examples to lift actionability.
Add an explicit verify step after publishing (e.g., check publishedArtifacts and retry on failure) to strengthen workflow_clarity for an outward-facing operation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and directive, assuming Claude's knowledge of Matrix/filesync; minor redundancy between "Do not expose object storage internals" and "Do not ask humans or Workers to inspect storage bucket names" keeps it just short of fully efficient. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete path conventions and executable filesync JSON snippets (list/pull/push) plus explicit publish_file parameters give mostly executable guidance; publish_file is described rather than shown as a complete call, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear pull-before-read / push-after-write sequencing with validation delegated to TeamHarness (refusal of sensitive paths plus publishedArtifacts status reporting); checkpoints are present but no explicit validate-fix-retry loop, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized section headers (Shared Files vs Room Files, Shared Paths, Filesync) and no nested references; good structure with minor organization headroom given its length. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |