Conciseness

The body contains only load-bearing, harness-specific rules — e.g., "原样使用返回值，不根据名称或路径推算 ID", "计划已保存不代表用户已批准", "只有...明确批准...才可进入构建" — with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no filler. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5; anchor 4 would require identifiable over-explanation to trim, and none is present.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: an exact script-interface table ("create_plan.py → plan_id、规范化 plan" etc.), the precise invocation rule ("通过 execute_shell_command 运行 <python> scripts/<script>"， "<python> 使用环境变量 QWENPAW_DESKTOP_PY_RUNTIME"), a complete copy-paste JSON plan payload, explicit enum mappings ("instruction/template/workflow、true/false、foreground/background 和 off/smoke/eval"), and a YAML frontmatter template — copy-paste ready with specific coverage of common cases, matching anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

The plan → approve → build → validate/test → publish lifecycle is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: "执行任何 draft script 或 batch 前，先对初始化后的草稿运行 validate_skill.py", "按静态或安全错误修复 draft 并重新校验", "更新返回 missing-plan 时，返回规划和批准流程，不继续构建", and digest verification on publish ("将校验结果中的 digest 作为 expected_digest 传入"). This matches anchor 5's explicit validation steps with error-recovery loops; validation is present, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that delegates detail to three real, one-level-deep bundle files (references/type-and-package.md, references/behavior-testing.md, references/run-batch.md — all verified present, none nesting further), each clearly signaled with conditional-loading rules: "计划的测试模式不是 off 时...阅读[行为测试]", "只有选择 batch: true 后，才...阅读[运行 Batch]；batch: false 时不要读取". Clear overview, well-signaled references, easy navigation — anchor 5.

Specificity

Quotes: "将当前对话中可复用的决策、知识、模板或工作流创建为聚焦的 workspace Skill" — names the deliverable and four concrete source types (decisions, knowledge, templates, workflows), which is more than the 1–2 actions of anchor 3, but the single action 'create' with no mention of the plan/approve/validate/publish lifecycle leaves minor coverage gaps, so it falls short of anchor 5's comprehensiveness.

Completeness

Quotes: "将...创建为聚焦的 workspace Skill" (clear what) and "适用于.../make-skill...“保存这个流程”“把它做成 skill”等请求；不适用于一次性总结或普通文件创建" (explicit when and when-not with concrete trigger phrases) — clearly and explicitly answers both what and when, matching anchor 5; not anchor 4 since the when-clause is fully explicit, not merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes: "适用于带 focus 参数的 /make-skill，以及“保存这个流程”“把它做成 skill”等请求" — includes natural phrases a user would actually say plus the exact slash command. A few natural synonyms (e.g., “记住这个做法”, “create a skill”) are missing, so it matches anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Quotes: "不适用于一次性总结或普通文件创建" — the niche (turning the current conversation into a skill) is distinct, its triggers (“保存这个流程”, /make-skill) would not fire for other skills, and explicit exclusions eliminate overlap with summarization or generic file-creation skills, matching anchor 5's minimal conflict risk.