Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable and well-sequenced workflow with concrete tool calls, real code examples, and robust validation feedback loops. Its weaknesses are conciseness (a long, repetitive ~630-line body) and progressive disclosure (everything inline with no bundle files despite exceeding the short-skill threshold).
Suggestions
Deduplicate the repeated "不要用 write_file" prohibition and absolute-path guidance into one clearly marked rule, then reference it elsewhere instead of restating, to trim the body well below ~630 lines.
Move the large batch-authoring template block (步骤 2b/2c 的 SKILL.md 正文结构示例) into a referenced file under references/ (e.g. references/batch-skill-template.md) so the main body is a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers, improving progressive_disclosure.
Split the worked example (the extract_headings.py + extract.json pair) into scripts/ or a separate examples reference so it is loaded only when needed rather than living inline in the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Much of the content is genuinely operational guidance about QwenPaw-specific tools (materialize_skill, create_plan, run_tool_batch, ${steps}/${args} mechanics) that Claude does not already know, so it is not explaining trivial concepts; however the ~630-line body is padded and repetitive (e.g. the "不要用 write_file 直接创建" prohibition and the absolute-path guidance are restated many times), matching the anchor-2 "Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened." It is not anchor-3 because not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, specific guidance: exact tool calls with required parameter names (create_plan's four required fields, materialize_skill's name/description/body/extra_files), a complete copy-paste Python script and a complete batch JSON example, and literal strings for expected_outcome, matching the anchor-3 "Fully executable code/commands; specific examples; copy-paste ready." | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The two-phase, step 0-5 process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops (4a's ${steps} reference-verification table, 4b's 试跑 batch with "反复修正直到跑通") plus structured error-recovery branches (4c naming conflict, 4d format error, 4e security scan, 4f other), matching the anchor-3 "Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery." | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is monolithic: no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle files exist and all ~630 lines are inline in SKILL.md. Sections are well organized (步骤 0-5, 2a-2f, 4a-4f, plus a summary flow diagram), but it far exceeds the "under 50 lines" exemption that would allow a 3 without external references, and substantial reusable blocks (the batch-authoring template, the worked example) are inline rather than split out, matching the anchor-2 "Some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline." | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |