Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but it provides only high-level direction with no concrete, executable guidance or defined steps. It tells Claude what to do in the abstract without showing how.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of the inspection, such as a specific command or the exact file(s)/tools to use, so the guidance is executable rather than a hint.
Spell out the inspection steps explicitly (what to look at, in what order) so the single-task workflow is unambiguous rather than implied.
Clarify what 'inspect' should produce (e.g., a summary, a list of findings) so the action has a defined outcome.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single lean line with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | 'Use QwenPaw's ordinary file tools to inspect the current project' is a high-level hint with no concrete commands, code, or specific steps to execute. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single vague instruction ('inspect the current project') gives only a rough direction with no defined steps or checkpoints; there are no concrete sub-steps to follow. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple skill under 50 lines with no bundle files; the single well-organized line needs no external references or further structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |