Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body with strong validation feedback loops and concrete reference data, weakened mainly by broken navigation links to editing.md and pptxgenjs.md (files absent from the bundle) and some motivational design prose that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Add the missing editing.md and pptxgenjs.md files (or remove the links and inline the essential steps) so the two primary navigation paths resolve.
Trim motivational rationale like "白底加纯文本要点无法打动任何人" to tighten the design section while keeping the concrete palette, font, and spacing tables.
Consider moving the large inline design-guidance block (palettes, fonts, avoid-list) into a separate design.md referenced from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — the concrete color-palette table, font-pairing table, pt-size specs, and bash commands earn their place — but motivational design rationale such as "白底加纯文本要点无法打动任何人" and "配色应该让人觉得是专门为这个主题设计的" is explanatory prose that could be tightened, so it sits at score 2 rather than the lean score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — `python -m markitdown presentation.pptx`, `python scripts/thumbnail.py`, `python scripts/office/unpack.py`, `soffice.py`/`pdftoppm` conversions, the placeholder grep, and a complete subagent visual-check prompt — matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The edit workflow is sequenced ("解包 → 操作幻灯片 → 编辑内容 → 清理 → 打包") and the "验证循环" section gives an explicit generate→convert→check→fix→re-validate feedback loop with "在完成至少一个修复-验证循环之前,不要宣布成功", matching the score-3 anchor for fragile document operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled one level deep ("阅读 [editing.md](editing.md)" / "[pptxgenjs.md](pptxgenjs.md)"), but those two primary detail files do not exist in the bundle and the large design-guidance section is inline, so the structure is well-intended but the broken links and inline bulk keep it at score 2 rather than the clean split of score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |