Content
51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally concise and appropriately avoids unnecessary structure for a trivial single-purpose skill, but it is too vague to be actionable, offering no concrete steps or commands for summarizing the workspace. Workflow clarity suffers from the same ambiguity.
Suggestions
Add a concrete instruction or example of what the summary should contain (e.g., list changed files, note test fixture outcomes, surface errors).
If summarization requires any commands or reads, include the specific commands or file paths to consult.
Clarify the single action so it is unambiguous, which would also lift workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | "Summarize the current workspace." is a single lean sentence with no padding or over-explanation, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor (5); it assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body gives only an abstract directive ("Summarize the current workspace") with no concrete commands, code, or specific steps, matching the entirely-vague/no-executable-guidance anchor (1); it describes rather than instructs. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a single poorly-defined instruction with no sequencing or validation, matching the rough/ambiguous anchor (2); it is not 1 because a single action is stated, and not 3 because "summarize" is ambiguous with no checkpoints. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple under-50-line skill with no bundle files and no need for external references, so the trivially well-organized single line qualifies for the simple-skill exception at 5; it is not penalized for lacking references it does not need. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |