CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

visual-asset-design

为角色/场景/道具设计视觉资产、编写或修复 VisualVariant 与阵容图的生成 Prompt 时使用。涵盖参考图布局(艺术身份板/序列关键帧/环境研究板/道具研究 板)、构图与镜头语言、图片审核误判规避、实体 continuity 与以主图为参考 的跨 Variant 衍生设计。不用于视频 Prompt 编译(见 professional-media-prompts)、 纯素材剪辑或只评价已生成产物。

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers dense, genuinely non-obvious domain knowledge with strong workflow sequencing and validation gates, and concrete examples throughout. Its main weaknesses are localized verbosity (generic camera-language list, repeated priority/caveat statements) and a fully monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure into reference files.

Suggestions

Move the 18-item generic camera-angle list in §3 to a brief pointer or trim it to the project-specific choices, since Claude already knows standard cinematography terms; keep only the composition-selection rules that encode this skill's defaults.

Split bulky reference material into one-level-deep bundle files (e.g., references/entity-schema.md for §5's VisualEntity field rules and references/moderation-pitfalls.md for the 审核误判 case study), leaving SKILL.md as a shorter overview with clearly signaled links.

State the '用户明确要求 > 默认推荐' priority and the '不指定渲染媒介' caveat once each in a shared 原则 section instead of repeating them in §1, §2, and §3, and add one fully assembled example prompt to make the 7-dimension structure copy-paste concrete.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most content is non-obvious pipeline-specific knowledge (field contracts, square-grid aspect-ratio math, the 2026-08-26 moderation case), but §3's 18-item camera-angle list is standard cinematography knowledge Claude already has, and the '用户明确要求 > 默认推荐' priority and the '不指定渲染媒介' caveat each repeat three or more times across sections.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable: a 7-dimension prompt structure, exact field names (canonical_variant_id, reference_artifact_version_ids), precise grid rules ('2–4 格→2×2,5–9 格→3×3'), specific moderation word families to avoid, and worked examples (湿噜噜, 庭院水池→夕阳). It falls short of fully copy-paste-ready because no complete assembled example prompt shows the target output.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 主图与衍生图制作顺序 is a numbered 1–5 workflow with explicit gating ('主图未生成…衍生 prompt 保持为空', '收到主图就绪…重新读取实际选中的 ArtifactVersion') and error-recovery loops (审核拒绝→改写措辞后重试; 空间矛盾→'先修正再供下游使用'; '实际检查过图像才可声明一致性已确认').

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body has real structure (numbered sections, subsections, a selection-rules table) but is a single ~250-line file with zero reference files; content such as the §5 entity-definition spec or the moderation case study clearly could be split into separate one-level-deep references.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capabilities, explicit use-when triggers, and explicit exclusions that disambiguate it from adjacent skills. The only weakness is trigger-term coverage that leans on internal jargon (VisualVariant, 阵容图) rather than the full range of natural user phrasings.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — '编写或修复 VisualVariant 与阵容图的生成 Prompt', '参考图布局(艺术身份板/序列关键帧/环境研究板/道具研究板)', '图片审核误判规避', '实体 continuity 与…跨 Variant 衍生设计' — covering the domain comprehensively with no significant gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'when' ('为角色/场景/道具设计视觉资产、编写或修复…生成 Prompt 时使用') and 'what' ('涵盖参考图布局…构图与镜头语言…实体 continuity…'), and adds explicit negative scope ('不用于视频 Prompt 编译…纯素材剪辑或只评价已生成产物').

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural domain keywords are present ('视觉资产', '角色/场景/道具', '生成 Prompt', '阵容图', '参考图'), but coverage is not comprehensive: internal jargon like 'VisualVariant' dominates and common synonyms users might say (设定图, 立绘, character sheet) are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (image reference-asset design within a specific pipeline) with explicit disambiguation from the sibling skill ('不用于视频 Prompt 编译(见 professional-media-prompts)'), minimizing wrong-skill triggering.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw

Path

plugins/apps/qwenpaw-creator/backend/skills/visual-asset-design/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.