Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured single-purpose skill body with executable code, clear failure-handling feedback loops, and clean sectioning. The only meaningful gap is that query-refinement guidance is described rather than shown as a concrete API parameter.
Suggestions
Show the concrete request-body or query parameter for refinement (e.g., "type":"search" vs "news", or a date-range field) alongside the "Refine the query" rule so the guidance is directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence—no padding, no generic explanations—every line is an API-specific fact (endpoint, auth header, response fields, failure branches), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | A complete, copy-paste-ready curl command with endpoint, auth, content-type, and body covers the common case, but the "Refine the query when freshness, date…matters" guidance lacks the concrete API parameter to actually do it, leaving a minor gap per anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (curl to the endpoint) is unambiguous, and the numbered Failure Handling section provides explicit conditional feedback loops while "Verify important claims against the linked source" acts as a validation checkpoint; the simple-skill exception applies since this is read-only, not destructive or batch. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and clearly organized sections (Rules, API, Curl, Response Use, Failure Handling), satisfying the rubric's simple-skill exception for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |