Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-organized overview that points to a real bundled script and gives executable commands. It is appropriately concise and well-structured, with only minor gaps in actionability and workflow verification.
Suggestions
Add a brief note on verifying results, e.g. checking the output JSON count or handling empty/zero-match results, to add a validation checkpoint.
Show an example of the default stdout output (omitting --output) so the common no-file case is explicitly covered.
Document expected output schema fields (line, timestamp, level, message) inline so Claude can interpret results without reading the script.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (purpose statement, one-line script description, two executable commands) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands with specific flags (--input, --output, --level) covering common cases, with only minor gaps such as not showing the default stdout behavior or how to interpret the output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-action skill the action (run the script with --input) is unambiguous and clearly sequenced, but no verification step for the output is described, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with a real, one-level-deep script reference (scripts/extract_errors.py, verified present) and well-organized sections (Available Scripts, Usage), matching the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |