Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured SOP with explicit validation and feedback loops and no padding. Its single weakness is the absence of a worked example query, which would lift actionability from 4 to 5.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example query (a few lines of SQL in a fenced block) applying the stated conventions, to make the guidance copy-paste ready and raise actionability.
Optionally show the expected output of the worked example in the report template format so the validate-and-report loop is illustrated end-to-end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — it never explains what SQL, CTEs, or WHERE clauses are, and each line (conventions, validation checks, report template) earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout (explicit-column-list rule, CTE preference, exact report template, concrete validation checks), but it stops short of a copy-paste-ready worked SQL example, which keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit validation step (row count, NULLs, numeric sanity check) and a feedback loop ('If anything looks off, do not report the number — fix the query first'), matching anchor 5 for batch/database operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with well-organized sections (Steps, Anti-patterns, When to delegate) and no inlined bulk content that belongs in separate files; no bundle files exist, so the lean single-file structure is appropriate per the simple-skills note. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |