CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

meta-analysis

Statistical methods for combining results across multiple studies. Use when aggregating cross-study or cross-experiment results.

63

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./researchclaw/skills/builtin/experiment/meta-analysis/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Meta-Analysis Best Practice

When comparing results across studies or experiments:

  1. Report effect sizes, not just p-values
  2. Use standardized metrics for cross-study comparison
  3. Account for heterogeneity (different setups, datasets, seeds)
  4. Report confidence intervals alongside point estimates
  5. Use forest plots to visualize cross-study comparisons
  6. Identify and discuss outliers or inconsistent results
  7. Consider publication bias when interpreting aggregate results
Repository
aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.