Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, reference-style skill that delivers publication-figure specs concisely with strong organization. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints for producing and exporting a figure.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow (design → size → color-check → annotate → export → validate) with an explicit validation checkpoint before submission.
Include one complete copy-paste matplotlib/seaborn example showing the recommended sizing, colorblind palette, and export-to-vector pattern.
Add a final verification step in the export checklist (e.g., open the exported file at print size and confirm 6pt readability) to close the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet lists with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line delivers an actionable specification. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout (sizing in inches/mm, named palettes, DPI values, panel-label conventions) with one executable code snippet, but most guidance is directive rather than copy-paste code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is organized as topical checklists rather than a sequenced workflow; the final 'Export and Quality Checklist' provides verification items but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the multi-step figure-production process. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized overview under 50 lines with no external references needed; section headers make navigation easy and no content is inappropriately inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |