Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is token-efficient and well-organized with useful schema templates, but it stops at specification rather than giving executable steps or validation feedback loops for the experimental workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit sequenced workflow (e.g., 1. write config, 2. run methods, 3. collect metrics, 4. validate against claims) with validation checkpoints before recording verdicts.
Provide at least one executable snippet or command for running a condition and emitting metrics.json so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: terse bullets, artifact paths, and compact JSON schemas with no concept-explaining fluff, assuming Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete templates (metrics.json and claim_verdicts schemas, artifact paths) but no executable commands or code to actually run experiments; guidance is a spec rather than runnable instruction. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections list what to define and produce (plan, artifacts, schema, rules) but there is no explicit execution sequence and no validation checkpoints for a batch/risky experimental process. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, well-organized SKILL.md with clear sections and no nested external references; no bundle files are needed or referenced, so the structure is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |