statistical-reporting

Statistical test selection, assumption checking, and APA-formatted reporting. Use when analyzing experimental results or writing results sections.

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A dense, well-organized instruction-only reference that is concise and highly actionable via concrete decision rules and APA templates. Its one gap is workflow clarity: the implicit select-check-report sequence is never presented as an explicit, checkpointed procedure.

Suggestions

Add a short 'Workflow' section that explicitly sequences the phases (select test → check assumptions → report in APA format with effect size) so the procedure is stated, not just implied by section order.

Include a validation checkpoint such as 'confirm assumptions before interpreting p-values' to give the implied workflow an explicit gate.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean reference format of terse decision rules and format templates with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — test-selection decision rules, named assumption tests with cutoffs (Shapiro-Wilk n<50, VIF<5), APA format templates, and numeric effect-size thresholds (d=0.2/0.5/0.8).	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Section order (test selection → assumption checking → APA reporting) implies the analytical sequence, but the workflow is never stitched into an explicit ordered procedure with checkpoints, so the sequence stays implicit.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A sub-50-line, single-purpose reference with no need for external files, well-organized into five clearly headed sections — meeting the simple-skills allowance for full marks without bundle references.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that clearly states capabilities and an explicit use-when trigger with low conflict risk. Its only weakness is trigger-term coverage: it omits the concrete test names (ANOVA, t-test, regression, p-value) that users would most naturally invoke.

Suggestions

Add the concrete test names users naturally say (e.g., 't-test', 'ANOVA', 'regression', 'p-value') to the 'Use when' clause to improve trigger-term coverage.

Consider mirroring a few of the metadata trigger-keywords into the description so the natural-language trigger matches what users actually type.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists three concrete actions — 'Statistical test selection, assumption checking, and APA-formatted reporting' — matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions, with no vague fluff.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Statistical test selection, assumption checking, and APA-formatted reporting') and when ('Use when analyzing experimental results or writing results sections'), satisfying the explicit-trigger anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant terms like 'statistical test', 'experimental results', and 'writing results sections' appear, but common natural variations users actually say ('run an ANOVA', 't-test', 'regression', 'p-value') are absent from the description despite being in the metadata keywords.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche — APA-formatted statistical reporting for experimental results — is distinct and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw
Path: .claude/skills/statistical-reporting/SKILL.md
Commit: e2e23c9

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.