source-evaluation
Use this skill when presenting information from external sources, citing research, or answering factual questions. Assess source credibility and recency before relying on it.
68
Quality
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Securityby
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Source Evaluation
CRAAP criteria (quick version):
- Currency: Is the source recent enough for this topic? (Technology: < 2 years; science: check if superseded)
- Relevance: Does it directly address the question?
- Authority: Is the author or organization credible in this domain?
- Accuracy: Is it peer-reviewed, cited, or verifiable from other sources?
- Purpose: Is it informational vs. promotional vs. opinion?
Red flags: anonymous authorship, no citations, sensational language, single-source claims.
Best practice: triangulate important facts across 2–3 independent sources before asserting them.
- Repository
- aiming-lab/MetaClaw
- Commit
922caf3
- Last updated
- First committed
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.