Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and clear for its single purpose, scoring high on token efficiency, workflow clarity, and disclosure. The only gap is actionability, where a short executable example or template would move it from concrete guidance to copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Add a minimal copy-paste plotting snippet (e.g., a 3-line matplotlib/seaborn template applying the table) to raise actionability to 3.
Optionally include one concrete before/after example of a corrected axis or palette choice to make the principles directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean goal-to-chart-type table plus a tight principles list with no concept-explaining filler, so every token earns its place as the score-3 anchor requires. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The mapping table and specific principles (e.g., 'Start y-axis at 0', named palettes 'viridis', 'colorbrewer') give concrete guidance, but there is no runnable code or copy-paste example, leaving it short of fully executable instruction. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill under 50 lines where the single action (select the right chart type) is unambiguous, and no destructive or batch operation requires validation checkpoints, so it qualifies for 3 per the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no external references needed, the under-50-line body is well organized into a decision table and a principles list, satisfying the simple-skills allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |