Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized, concise, and actionable with executable CLI examples and a precise intermediate markdown spec. Its main weaknesses are a missing validation/verification checkpoint in the generation workflow (capping workflow_clarity at 3) and references to sample files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the workflow (e.g., open the generated .docx and confirm section headers are bold/single-line/uniform-colored and Publications retain original citation strings), with a fix-and-regenerate loop, to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Reconcile the output filename: the body states "Name-Academic-CV.docx" but render_cv.py produces "{name}-academic resume.docx" — update one to match the other.
Either include the referenced sample_input_standard.txt and sample_output.docx files in the bundle or remove the references, so progressive_disclosure references all point to real files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes competence — no padding about what a CV or Word file is — with executable CLI examples and a compact markdown spec; some rules are restated across Key Features and Implementation Details and could be trimmed, keeping it just below the lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands with documented flags ("python scripts/render_cv.py --input ... --output ...", "--lang zh|en", "--header-color purple|cyan|green|red|random") and an exact markdown template; minor gaps are the missing referenced sample input/output files, so it does not reach the copy-paste-complete 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered end-to-end sequence is present, but there is no validation or verification checkpoint for the document-generation step, and the rubric caps batch/document workflows without feedback loops at 3; a filename discrepancy (skill says "Name-Academic-CV.docx" while the script writes "{name}-academic resume.docx") further weakens it. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure with a single one-level reference to a real bundle file (scripts/render_cv.py, verified present) and well-organized sections; minor gaps from references to non-existent files (sample_input_standard.txt, sample_output.docx, output/ZhangWei-Academic-CV.docx) keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |