Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a clearly sequenced, actionable research-design planner with strong progressive disclosure via real reference files and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is verbosity, with hard rules and rationale restating guidance already implied by the workflow steps.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Hard Rules' section by removing rules that merely restate constraints already enforced by Steps 5–6 and the output sections, keeping only genuinely additive guardrails.
Promote a few explicitly inlined reference summaries (e.g., the full config comparison table in Step 3) into the corresponding reference files to reduce body length.
Make the validation feedback loop in Section F fully explicit (validate → if errors, fix and re-validate → only proceed when valid) to lift workflow clarity toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-structured but runs long and restates some guidance the model already understands (e.g., extensive hard-rules restating workflow constraints already covered in the steps), so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable direction — explicit step sequencing, named output sections (A–J), required fields, table formats, and explicit redirect text for out-of-scope requests — with only minor gaps where detail is delegated to references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step execution sequence is clearly ordered with mandatory dependency and consistency checkpoints (Step 5) and validation/robustness separation (Section F), though some validation feedback loops are described at a structural rather than fully explicit validate-fix-retry level. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md acts as an overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to eight real bundle files (study-patterns.md, workload-configurations.md, etc.), each linked inline at the relevant step; minor gaps are that some detail is still inlined rather than pushed to references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |