CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

basic-research-design

A biomedical research topic designer that generates progressive experimental subtitles and detailed research outlines based on a given subject. Use when the user wants to design a research proposal, outline experiments for a topic, or structure a biomedical study.

49

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Protocol Design/basic-research-design/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Basic Research Topic Design

This skill helps users design a biomedical research topic by generating progressive subtitles and a detailed experimental outline.

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the request matches its documented task boundary.
  • Use it when the user can provide the required inputs and expects a structured deliverable.
  • Prefer this skill for repeatable, checklist-driven execution rather than open-ended brainstorming.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: A biomedical research topic designer that generates progressive experimental subtitles and detailed research outlines based on a given subject. Use when the user wants to design a research proposal, outline experiments for a topic, or structure a biomedical study.
  • Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

Skill directory: 20260316/scientific-skills/Protocol Design/basic-research-design
No packaged executable script was detected.
Use the documented workflow in SKILL.md together with the references/assets in this folder.

Example run plan:

  1. Read the skill instructions and collect the required inputs.
  2. Follow the documented workflow exactly.
  3. Use packaged references/assets from this folder when the task needs templates or rules.
  4. Return a structured result tied to the requested deliverable.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: instruction-only workflow in SKILL.md.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Workflow

Follow these steps to generate the research design.

Step 1: Generate Subtitles

  1. Identify the Subject (keywords) from the user's request (e.g., "PD-1 in lung cancer").
  2. Use the Subtitle Generation Prompt (see references/prompt_templates.md) to generate 6 progressive subtitles.
  3. Input for Prompt:
    • <Subject>: The user's subject.

Step 2: Generate Research Outline

  1. Take the Subject and the Subtitles generated in Step 1.
  2. Use the Research Outline Generation Prompt (see references/prompt_templates.md) to generate the detailed outline.
  3. Input for Prompt:
    • <Subject>: The original subject.
    • <Subtitles>: The output from Step 1.

Quality Rules

  • Progressive Logic: Ensure the subtitles and experiments show a clear logical progression (screening -> verification -> mechanism -> in vivo).
  • Specific Methods: The outline must include specific experimental method names.
  • No Summary: Do not output a summary at the end.
  • Exact Count: Ensure exactly 6 subtitles are generated in Step 1.

Output Format

Present the final result in Markdown, following the format specified in the prompt templates.

When Not to Use

  • Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
  • Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
  • Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.

Required Inputs

  • A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
  • All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
  • Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.

Output Contract

  • Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
  • If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as basic_research_design_result.md unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
  • Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.

Validation and Safety Rules

  • Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
  • Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
  • Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
  • Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.

Failure Handling

  • If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
  • If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
  • If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of basic-research-design and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

basic-research-design only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Quick Validation

Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:

No local script validation step is required for this skill.

Expected output format:

Result file: basic_research_design_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
Repository
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.