CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bibliography

Classifies and organizes literature by theme, method, and conclusion; use when you need to batch-read a folder of PDF/MD/DOCX/TXT files and output a structured CSV for literature reviews and annotation management.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Other/bibliography/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with a coherent pipeline and real referenced bundle files, but it relies on repetition rather than executable code and omits validation checkpoints for a batch operation. Tightening the redundant sections and adding a verification step would meaningfully raise quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification checkpoint after CSV generation (e.g., assert row count equals document count and confirm UTF-8 encoding) to satisfy the batch-operation validation requirement.

Replace or supplement the repeated field-extraction rules across sections with one canonical definition, referencing it from elsewhere to reduce redundancy.

Provide at least minimal executable guidance (a code snippet or concrete command) for the PDF-to-Markdown and DOCX-text extraction steps rather than only describing them.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts, but field-extraction rules are restated across 'Key Features', 'Example Summary Markdown Structure', and 'Implementation Details', so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete rules are given (CSV header source, UTF-8, 'Not recognized' fallback, pdf-extract location logic) but no executable code or commands are provided and DOCX extraction is only vaguely described, leaving key execution details incomplete.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence exists (read/normalize, generate Summary Markdown, extract fields, output CSV), but this batch workflow lacks any verification/validation checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/guide.md) and an asset (assets/bibliography_template.csv) that both exist; the reference could be linked more prominently, so it sits just below the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong, explicitly pairing a concrete capability statement with a 'use when' trigger clause and file-extension keywords. It is mostly distinct and specific, with only minor gaps in synonym coverage and action granularity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Classifies and organizes literature by theme, method, and conclusion', 'batch-read a folder of PDF/MD/DOCX/TXT files', 'output a structured CSV') with minor gaps; 'classifies and organizes' is slightly abstract so it falls below the comprehensive 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states both what ('Classifies and organizes literature by theme, method, and conclusion') and when ('use when you need to batch-read a folder of PDF/MD/DOCX/TXT files and output a structured CSV for literature reviews'), matching the explicit-what-and-when anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage including file extensions (PDF/MD/DOCX/TXT), 'structured CSV', and 'literature reviews', but natural synonyms like 'PDFs', 'summarize papers', or 'make a bibliography' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (batch literature review into CSV) with distinct triggers, but 'organizes literature' could overlap marginally with general document-organization skills, keeping it just below the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.