Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a complete runnable example and specific API guidance, but it is held back by a generic, non-concrete validation workflow and by failing to link or surface the substantial references/structure.md file that already exists. Tightening the padded template sections would also improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Link and surface references/structure.md from SKILL.md (e.g., under Implementation Details: "For full API coverage of parsing, geometry, DSSP, superposition, and IO, see references/structure.md") so the detailed reference is one level deep and clearly signaled.
Replace the generic Recommended Workflow validation steps with concrete checkpoints (e.g., a verify command or explicit JSON-schema/field checks) and add a validate->fix->retry loop for the batch neighbor-search/structure-writing path to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Trim the padded template sections (Validation and Safety Rules, Failure Handling, Quick Validation) and remove restatements of obvious knowledge (e.g., that distances use Euclidean norm) to improve conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining what Bio.PDB is, but several sections restate obvious knowledge (e.g., "Distances are typically computed from atomic coordinates using Euclidean norm") and the template-style Validation/Output/Failure sections add padding that could be tightened, fitting the "mostly efficient but some unnecessary explanation" 3-anchor rather than the lean 5-anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | A complete, copy-paste-ready Python example with a concrete config JSON and run command is provided, and the Implementation Details give specific, executable API guidance (NeighborSearch(...).search(center, radius, level=...), calc_angle/calc_dihedral) covering common cases, matching the fully executable top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A Recommended Workflow is listed (validate inputs -> select path -> produce output -> final validation) but validation is described generically rather than as concrete checkpoints, and there is no real validate->fix->retry feedback loop for the batch-style neighbor-search/structure-writing operation; this fits the "steps listed but validation gaps" 3-anchor and is capped there by the missing explicit feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well section-organized, but a substantial reference file exists (references/structure.md) covering parsing, geometry, DSSP, superposition, and IO that is never linked or signaled from SKILL.md, so detailed material that belongs in a referenced file is inlined/unsurfaced; this matches the 3-anchor (some structure, references present but not clearly signaled) and not the well-signaled 4/5 anchors. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |