Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body built around a runnable cross-service script, with only minor conciseness slack. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the rich references/ and scripts/ bundle is never linked from SKILL.md.
Suggestions
Link the existing bundle from the body, e.g. under 'Implementation Details' add '**Full service reference**: See [references/services_reference.md](references/services_reference.md)' and similar pointers for workflow_patterns.md and identifier_mapping.md.
Move the per-method signature catalog in 'Common parameters' into references/services_reference.md, keeping only the most-used signatures inline in SKILL.md.
Trim restating comments in the example script (e.g. '# show header + first rows') to tighten token usage without losing clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and stays mostly lean, but the ~80-line example script carries restating comments and the Implementation Details section re-lists API signatures that could be trimmed; matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A fully copy-paste-ready script covers six common cross-service cases (UniProt search/retrieve, ID mapping, KEGG pathway/KGML/SIF, QuickGO, PSICQUIC, compound→ChEMBL) and Implementation Details gives concrete method signatures, matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The example is framed as an explicit numbered 1–6 sequence with code for each step; operations are read-only retrievals so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply, but no explicit validation checkpoints are shown, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear, but bundle files exist (references/services_reference.md, workflow_patterns.md, identifier_mapping.md and four scripts) and are never referenced or signaled from the body, while the long example and API reference are inlined; matches 'some structure; references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |