Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a validation-first checkpoint, backed by real one-level-deep reference files. Its main weakness is substantial redundancy — the same evidence levels, overclaim patterns, and severity classes are restated across several sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicated enumerations: state evidence levels, overclaim patterns, and severity classes once and reference the corresponding file instead of restating them in 'Task', 'Important Distinctions', 'Execution', and 'Mandatory Output Structure'.
Merge or trim the largely overlapping 'Hard Rules', 'What This Skill Should Not Do', and 'Quality Standard' sections to reduce repeated content.
Move the inline evidence-level and overclaim-pattern lists entirely into their reference files, keeping the body as an overview that signals when to consult each reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The same enumerations recur across multiple sections — evidence levels in 'Task', 'Important Distinctions', 'Execution Step 3', and 'Mandatory Output Structure'; overclaim patterns in 'Task', 'Reference Module Integration', 'Execution Step 4', and 'Mandatory Output Structure'; plus duplicated 'Hard Rules', 'What This Skill Should Not Do', and 'Quality Standard' — creating noticeably verbose, redundant padding that could be consolidated. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete instruction-only guidance: explicit 9-step execution, a mandatory 8-part output structure (sections A–H), defined severity buckets (major/moderate/minor/unclear), and concrete overclaim detection patterns, giving mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences a clear 9-step process with an explicit validation checkpoint in 'Step 1 — Clarify before calibrating' ('do not immediately produce a full calibration review… ask focused follow-up questions'), plus a defined final output structure; missing only an explicit post-output error-recovery loop, so it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References seven one-level-deep files under 'Reference Module Integration', each clearly signaled with a purpose bullet, and all referenced paths verified to exist; however content that also lives in those references (evidence levels, overclaim patterns, severity classes) is inlined in the body, leaving a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |