Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with excellent progressive disclosure via real, clearly-mapped reference modules. Its main weakness is redundancy — the same prohibitions and role distinctions are repeated across several sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated prohibition lists ('must not confuse', 'Hard Rules', 'What This Skill Should Not Do', 'Core Function should not') into a single canonical rules section to reduce token cost.
Add one short worked example of a completed output section (e.g., a filled Section F table) to make the actionable spec concrete.
Trim the overlapping variable-role descriptions between 'Variable Role Logic', 'Step 3', and Section B output guidance to a single source of truth.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly operational, but the same prohibitions are restated across 'This skill must not confuse', 'Core Function should not', 'Hard Rules', and 'What This Skill Should Not Do', creating several padded sections that could be consolidated. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance for an instruction-only skill: an 8-step decision logic, Sections A–K with table column specs, a five-category handling taxonomy, and a ready out-of-scope redirect template, though no worked example of a completed section is provided. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–8 are clearly sequenced with input validation and a pressure-test/self-critical review checkpoint; minor gaps as the skill is planning rather than destructive/batch execution so the cap-3 rule does not bind. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All nine reference files exist and are signaled one level deep with explicit section mapping ('use when classifying variables in Sections B, C, and F'); the body is a lean overview pointing to the operational rules. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |