Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear workflow, verification checklist, and clean one-level-deep references to existing bundle files. Only minor conciseness gains remain from consolidating the input-validation and Step 1 input lists.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no definitions of cover letters or journals), but the 'Input Validation' accepts/out-of-scope lists partially overlap with Step 1's mandatory/optional inputs and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready paragraph scaffolds (P1–P5 with quoted template text), a specific 300–450 word length target, and concrete tone/avoid/use lists that fully specify the output. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (collect inputs → draft → calibrate → final check) culminates in an explicit verification checklist with checkboxes, giving a complete feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that points via clearly signaled, one-level-deep links to two real bundle files (assets/cover_letter_template.md and references/guide.md), both of which exist, with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |