Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
64
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2/SKILL.mdThis skill evaluates clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias and applicability concerns using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
To assess a study, follow these steps:
Analyze Patient Selection:
references/quadas_2_criteria.md for detailed signaling questions.Analyze Index Test:
Analyze Reference Standard:
Analyze Flow and Timing:
For each domain (Patient Selection, Index Test, Reference Standard, Flow and Timing), you MUST output the findings in the following structure:
### [Domain Name]
**[Signaling Question 1]?**
- Comments: [Explanation in Chinese]
- Quote: [Original text quote]
- Answer: [Yes/No/Unclear]
... (Repeat for all signaling questions)For processing PDF literature, you can use the provided Python script:
# Install dependencies
pip install PyPDF2
# Extract full text
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf"
# Extract specific page range
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf" 5 15The script will automatically extract the text, which you can then copy and send to me for QUADAS-2 assessment.
This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
| Field | Required | Format/Source | Example | If Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User task description | Yes | Text | Research question, writing goal, analysis objective | Stop and ask user to provide |
| Primary input material | Depends on task | Text, file path, ID, table, or literature | PMID, PDF, CSV, DOCX, keywords, etc. | Specify which material type is missing |
| Output preference | No | Text | Language, format, target journal, template | Use skill default format |
63c61d3
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.