Automatically detect DOCX track-changes history, version rounds, and author feedback to generate a Markdown modification explanation file when you run it on one or more DOCX versions.
53
60%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Other/docx-feedback-tracker/SKILL.md-v1, -v2, -v3) and want to reconstruct round-based modifications into a single report.w:ins / w:del) and comments.<topic>-change-log.md per series.python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py "path\file.docx"python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py "path\file-v1.docx" "path\file-v2.docx" "path\file-v3.docx"python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py --dir "path" --pattern "*.docx"<topic>-change-log.mdscript/docx_feedback_tracker.py-vN (e.g., report-v2.docx)-N (e.g., report-2.docx) — only applied when a same-name base exists.document.xmlcomments.xmlw:ins for inserted contentw:del for deleted contentassets/change-log-template.mdreferences/docx-tracked-changes.mddocx_feedback_tracker_result.md unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
No local script validation step is required for this skill.Expected output format:
Result file: docx_feedback_tracker_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any63c61d3
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.