CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grant-specific-aims-writer

Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications. Use when drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary, or equivalent for any major funding agency. Also triggers on "write my specific aims", "help me draft specific aims for NIH", "what should a specific aims page include", "NSF project summary", "write my grant aims", or "how do I structure an R01".

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable body that gives concrete scaffolding for grant aims writing and defers detail to clearly signaled reference files. Minor weaknesses are motivational padding, soft (rather than hard) validation checkpoints, and two orphaned bundle files not referenced from the body.

Suggestions

Link budget_templates.md from the References section or remove it if out of scope, and either reference main.py in the workflow or drop it, so every bundle file is reachable from the body.

Trim motivational filler ('the most critical single page', 'Every element must earn its space') and the redundant blockquote to tighten token efficiency.

Strengthen the self-review checklist into a hard gating checkpoint (e.g., 'Do not deliver until every checklist item passes') to push workflow clarity toward the 5 anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with tight structure (ASCII page map, bulleted principles, hard rules), but includes minor motivational padding ('the most critical single page', 'Every element must earn its space') and a redundant blockquote that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready sentence scaffolding ('The overall objective of this [mechanism] is to [what you will do]...'), specific word counts, and mechanism-specific aim counts; full worked examples are deferred to references, leaving a minor gap versus the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Five sequenced steps with an explicit self-review checklist (Step 5) and feedback loops ('narrow before drafting', 'ask for a hypothesis before drafting'); falls short of 5 because checkpoints are soft self-reviews rather than hard validation gates with error-recovery loops.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-signaled one-level-deep references (NIH template, NSF template, examples, checklist) and a clean overview body, but budget_templates.md exists in references without being linked and main.py is unused — minor organization gaps that prevent a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-targeted description that clearly states the skill's purpose and provides comprehensive natural trigger phrases. The only minor gap is that the action list centers on one core task rather than enumerating multiple distinct capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'Writes Specific Aims pages', 'drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary' — but centers on one core task with variations rather than multiple distinct actions, so it stops short of the comprehensive 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications') and when ('Use when drafting or revising... Also triggers on...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Six natural user phrases ('write my specific aims', 'help me draft specific aims for NIH', 'how do I structure an R01', etc.) give comprehensive coverage of natural terms and synonyms, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (grant Specific Aims / NSF Project Summary) with distinct, agency-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.