Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with excellent progressive disclosure and a clear gated workflow, weakened mainly by notable redundancy across its rule-listing sections. Consolidating the repeated guidance would meaningfully improve token efficiency without losing clarity.
Suggestions
Merge the overlapping rule lists (Core Function, Hard Rules, What This Skill Should Not Do, Quality Standard) into a single consolidated rules block to remove redundancy and reduce token cost.
Add one concise worked example output (e.g., a short NSCLC cohort eligibility framework) so the abstract Sections A–J structure has a concrete model to follow.
Make the workflow's error-recovery loop explicit (e.g., 'if Section G flags a contradictory criterion, return to Step 3/4 and revise before finalizing') to close the validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of generic-concept padding, but the same themes (clarify first, don't invent boundaries, don't mix baseline with outcomes, operationalize, flag ambiguity) are restated across Core Function, Decision Logic, Hard Rules, What This Skill Should Not Do, and Quality Standard, which could be consolidated. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable guidance: a mandatory Sections A–J output structure, an operationalization table with explicit columns, a clarification-gating checklist, an out-of-scope redirect template, and per-section reference module assignments; it stops short of a fully worked example output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step Decision Logic sequence names the reference module for each step, with a mandatory clarification gate (Step 1), a required self-critical risk review (Hard Rule 11), and a draft-status completion checkpoint (Section J); it lacks an explicit error-recovery retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md acts as an overview pointing to nine one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled with its filename and the specific section/step where it applies; verified that referenced files exist and contain no nested .md cross-references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |